Skepticism, Contextualism, and Discrimination”
نویسنده
چکیده
The skeptic says that “knowledge” is an absolute term, whereas the contextualist says that ‘knowledge” is a relationally absolute term. Which is the better hypothesis about “knowledge”? And what implications do these hypotheses about “knowledge” have for knowledge? I argue that the skeptic has the better hypothesis about “knowledge”, but that both hypotheses about “knowledge” have deeply anti-skeptical implications for knowledge, since b t h presuppose our capacity for epistemically salient discrimination.
منابع مشابه
Tim Sundell “contextualism and the Semantic Strategy in Epistemology”
Contextualism in epistemology is the view that on different occasions of utterance, the English verb know expresses different propositional attitudes—attitudes that vary in the required degree or kind of justification. For terminological convenience, I will distinguish between two contextualist theses. First, there is what Iʼll call linguistic contextualism (LC). By linguistic contextualism, I ...
متن کاملContextualism, Skepticism and Objectivity
In this paper, I try to make sense of the idea that true knowledge attributions characterize something that is more valuable than true belief and that survives even if, as Contextualism implies, contextual changes make it no longer identifiable by a knowledge attribution. I begin by sketching a familiar, pragmatic picture of assertion that helps us to understand and predict how the words “S kno...
متن کاملOn “ from Contextualism to Contrastivism ”
Jonathan Schaffer is sympathetic to the contextualist approach to epistemology, broadly construed, but thinks that it hasn’t got the account of the verb “knows” quite right. Contextualists are on to something, but their view needs to be reformulated to give a correct account of the way we talk about knowledge, and (he argues) the reformulated view can do a better job of developing and defending...
متن کاملTechnology Classification Framework for E-Learning Purposes from a Knowledge Management Perspective
Often there is skepticism whether there is an overestimation of the capabilities that the integration of Information Technology (IT) offers in learning. The fact that learning is contextual means that technology has to support this contextualism of the phenomenon. Many researchers claim that e-learning is just a waste of time as, the effectiveness and the performance of the effort undertaken is...
متن کاملContextualism and Conceptual Disambiguation
I distinguish between Old Contextualism, New Contextualism, and the Multiple Concepts Theory. I argue that Old Contextualism cannot handle the following three problems: (i) the disquotational paradox, (ii) upward pressure resistance, (iii) inability to avoid the acceptance of skeptical conclusions. New Contextualism, in contrast, can avoid these problems. However, since New Contextualism appear...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007